Why Russia’s use of an obsolete missile is a dangerous provocation

Russia’s recent launch of a P-35 anti-ship missile at Ukraine from a ground-based launcher in Crimea is not only a blatant violation of international law and norms, but also a reckless and irresponsible act.

The P-35 missile, which entered service in 1965 and weighs four tons, is an ancient and outdated weapon that has been surpassed by more modern and accurate missiles. The missile was intercepted by Ukrainian air defense systems, which prevented a potential catastrophe. However, the fact that Russia chose to use such a weapon in the first place raises serious questions about its intentions and motivations.

One possible explanation is that Russia wanted to test the capabilities and readiness of the Ukrainian forces, as well as the response of the international community. By using a low-tech and low-cost missile, Russia may have hoped to avoid a strong reaction from its adversaries, while still sending a message of intimidation and aggression. However, this strategy is flawed and dangerous, as it underestimates the risks and consequences of such a move.

Regardless of the rationale behind Russia’s use of an obsolete missile, the result is the same: a dangerous escalation of tensions and a deterioration of the security situation in the region. Russia’s actions not only threaten the stability and peace of Europe, but also undermine the global order and the rule of law. The international community must condemn and sanction Russia for its reckless and irresponsible behavior, and support Ukraine in its efforts to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Russia must realize that its use of an obsolete missile is not a sign of strength, but of weakness and desperation.