Unpacking the Complexity of Hamas’s Unprecedented Assault on Israel

Christian Baghai
3 min readOct 9, 2023

--

In the light of the shockingly coordinated and massive-scale attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023, it is crucial to pause and dissect the many dimensions of this act of violence, its motives, and the implications for the Israel-Palestine conflict and wider geopolitics. This piece is informed by a TV interview conducted by Christiane Amanpour with Dr. Bruce Hoffman, a leading expert on terrorism and counterterrorism.

A Violent Undertaking

Hamas, the Palestinian militant group originating from the Muslim Brotherhood, launched an attack of unprecedented scale that caught Israel off guard. Using underground tunnels to infiltrate, militants targeted military installations, airports, power plants, and even civilian areas across Israel. The act was a horrifying blend of technical sophistication and extremist zeal, leaving many questioning how such an operation could have been planned under the noses of Israeli intelligence.

Motives Are Multifaceted

While Hamas’s raison d’être — liberating Palestine and establishing an Islamic state — has been consistent since its founding, the motivations behind this specific attack are layered and complex. First, there is a deep-seated rivalry between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority (PA). The PA has been gradually moving toward diplomatic engagements with Israel and other Arab states, something that Hamas views as treachery to the Palestinian cause. Second, the death of its longtime leader, Ismail Haniyeh, last September might have created a power vacuum and an urge within the group to assert its unchallenged leadership in the Palestinian struggle. Lastly, the deplorable living conditions in Gaza due to Israeli blockades and Egyptian restrictions could have also exacerbated the tensions.

The Perverse Irony of the Attack’s Timing

The attack occurring on Yom Kippur — the holiest day in Judaism — is not an innocuous detail. It’s a perverse irony that on a day traditionally associated with atonement and forgiveness, we are faced with an act that fundamentally defies these principles. The timing could be seen as a historical callback to the Yom Kippur War of 1973, a conflict that, like the current attack, caught Israel by surprise and led to heavy casualties on both sides.

The Geopolitical Landscape

Hamas’s acts of terror not only have local implications but also influence geopolitical relationships. Classified as a terrorist organization by entities such as the United States and the European Union, the group’s actions throw a wrench into the sensitive machinery of Middle East diplomacy. Every act of violence by Hamas makes it increasingly difficult for advocates of a two-state solution to make their case. It also places the international community in a quandary over how to handle relationships with the Palestinian territories.

A Need for Nuanced Understanding

One of the key takeaways from Dr. Bruce Hoffman’s interview was the necessity for a nuanced understanding of terrorism and its motivations. Condemning the violence is straightforward, but understanding why it occurred and what its implications might be is critical for any hopes of future peace. It is essential to take into account not only the ideologies that fuel such extremist organizations but also the geopolitical and humanitarian factors that contribute to their actions.

In Summary

The recent Hamas attack on Israel is not merely another incident in the long list of conflicts between Israel and Palestine. Its unprecedented scale, the complexity of its motivations, and the subsequent implications for regional and global politics make it an alarming bellwether for potential escalations in extremism and violence. As difficult as it may be amid the smoke and rubble, it’s imperative that we engage in informed dialogue to better understand the factors leading to such attacks, in the hopes that such understanding could be a first step toward resolving this protracted and painful conflict.

--

--

Christian Baghai
Christian Baghai

Responses (1)