This article is a breath of fresh air in the midst of the usual techno-utopian discourse surrounding AI. It's important to acknowledge that while AI has immense potential, it also comes with equally large pitfalls that need to be addressed proactively, rather than reactively.

The EU's proposed AI Act is an example of precisely this kind of foresight. It seeks to mitigate potential risks before they snowball into unsolvable problems. The categorisation of risk levels offers a balanced and thoughtful approach to handling AI, and I commend the EU for coming up with such a comprehensive framework.

That being said, I believe the impact on content creators, particularly those who ethically incorporate AI into their work, might be more significant than what the author suggests. Labeling AI-generated content might inadvertently discourage consumers from engaging with it, affecting those who utilize AI as a tool for creativity. The potential for increased litigation around copyright issues is another concerning aspect that could stifle creativity and innovation.

Nevertheless, the fundamental aspect remains: transparency is vital. Consumers have the right to know whether the content they're consuming was generated by a human or an AI, particularly if personal data has been used.

As for the author's worry about another wave of migration induced by AI surveillance and AI police from less democratic regimes, it's a reminder that AI has implications beyond just business and technology. The regulation of AI, hence, should be a matter of global concern.

This article effectively prompts us to think about the role of regulation in balancing the promise and peril of AI. Despite some potential issues, it's heartening to see this proactive approach, setting up the guardrails for AI development, being advocated. Hopefully, other nations will follow the EU's lead and ensure AI's evolution in a manner that is safe, beneficial and respectful of human rights.