The Precarious Dance with Nuclear Weapons: A Reflection on Humanity’s Close Calls

Christian Baghai
3 min readSep 12, 2023

--

Ever since the inception of nuclear weapons, humanity has teetered on the precipice of self-destruction. The sheer power and devastation that these weapons can unleash is both awe-inspiring and terrifying. But what’s even more alarming is the number of times we’ve come perilously close to unleashing this power, not through deliberate acts of war, but through accidents, miscalculations, and misinterpretations.

Consider the events of January 17, 1966. A B-52 bomber, armed with four hydrogen bombs, each possessing a destructive force 75 times greater than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, was flying over the coast of Spain. This wasn’t a special mission; it was routine during the height of the Cold War. The strategy was simple: have bombers in the air, close to potential targets, ready to retaliate in case of a first strike from the USSR. But during a mid-air refueling operation, something went terribly wrong. The two planes collided, leading to an explosion that claimed the lives of seven crew members. The four bombs plummeted to Earth. Two detonated upon impact, not in a nuclear explosion, but enough to scatter radioactive plutonium over a 2.6 square kilometer area. The third was found intact, but the fourth remained missing for 81 days. It’s a chilling thought: a hydrogen bomb, lost for nearly three months.

This incident is not unique. In fact, such occurrences are frequent enough that the U.S. military coined a term for them: “broken arrows.” Between 1950 and 1980, the Pentagon officially lists 32 such accidents. Five of these occurred during Operation Chrome Dome, where B-52 bombers, armed with hydrogen bombs, crashed. In one particularly harrowing incident in 1961, a B-52 crashed over North Carolina. It was carrying two four-megaton bombs. One of these bombs, when later inspected, was found to be a single switch away from detonation.

The potential consequences of these accidents are not just the immediate destruction and contamination. They also include the geopolitical ramifications. Imagine if the 1966 incident had occurred closer to the Soviet border. Would it have been interpreted as an act of aggression? Could it have triggered a retaliatory strike?

But accidents are just one part of the equation. The Cold War era was rife with moments of tension, where the world stood on the brink of nuclear war. The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 is a prime example. At the height of the crisis, a Soviet submarine, believing that war had broken out, was ready to launch a nuclear torpedo. It was only the decision of one man, Vasili Arkhipov, that prevented a full-blown nuclear exchange between the U.S. and the USSR.

False alarms have also played their part in this dangerous dance. In 1983, the Soviet early warning system detected the launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile. The officer on duty, Stanislav Petrov, dismissed it as a glitch, a decision that potentially saved millions of lives. Similarly, in 1995, a scientific rocket launched off the coast of Norway was mistaken by Russian radar as a missile, bringing the nuclear launch codes to the Russian president.

These incidents highlight a crucial point. While many believe that the primary threat of nuclear weapons is their deliberate use, the real danger may lie in unforeseen accidents and misinterpretations. As long as these weapons exist, the future of humanity remains uncertain.

However, there is a glimmer of hope. From a peak of over 70,000 nuclear weapons in 1986, the number had reduced to 12,705 by 2022. This reduction is a testament to global efforts to minimize the nuclear threat. But as long as even one weapon remains, the risk persists.

In reflecting on these events, one can’t help but marvel at the combination of luck, judgment, and human intervention that has prevented catastrophe. But relying on luck is a dangerous game.

--

--

Christian Baghai
Christian Baghai

No responses yet