The CARVER Technique: A Military Tool for Vulnerability Assessment

Christian Baghai
3 min readJan 1, 2024

--

In the complex realm of military strategy and security planning, the CARVER technique stands out as a pivotal tool for assessing vulnerabilities and prioritizing targets. Initially developed by the U.S. Special Forces during the Vietnam War, the CARVER technique has evolved into a standard methodology for evaluating the vulnerabilities of enemy assets and for defensive purposes. It’s a system that has been integral to the operations of various sectors, including the military, law enforcement, information technology, and even humanitarian aid.

Understanding the CARVER Technique

CARVER, an acronym for Criticality, Accessibility, Recuperability, Vulnerability, Effect, and Recognizability, is a scoring system that evaluates potential targets based on these six criteria. Each criterion is given a numerical value, typically on a scale of 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater importance or vulnerability.

The Criteria Explained

  1. Criticality: This assesses the importance of the target in the enemy’s operation. It questions the extent of damage or disruption that would be caused by attacking or defending the target.
  2. Accessibility: This criterion considers how easy or challenging it is to reach the target, taking into account the barriers and obstacles that might be faced.
  3. Recuperability: This measures the target’s ability to recover from an attack, including the resilience of the target and the availability of backup systems.
  4. Vulnerability: This evaluates how susceptible the target is to potential attack methods and the level of protection or security it possesses.
  5. Effect: This looks at the impact of an attack on the target, including psychological, political, and social repercussions.
  6. Recognizability: This criterion assesses how easily the target can be identified and located.

Application and Versatility

The CARVER technique’s simplicity and adaptability make it a favored tool for various scenarios. It’s used in military operations for selecting targets in kinetic and non-kinetic actions, in intelligence operations for target selection and in counterterrorism for identifying critical threats. Its application extends beyond the military into sectors like business management, where it can guide decisions on innovation and improvement strategies.

Advantages and Disadvantages

The CARVER technique’s main advantage lies in its straightforward and intuitive scoring system, which doesn’t require complex tools and can be applied across various types of targets and scenarios. It promotes a consistent and objective framework for target evaluation, aiding in resource allocation and decision-making processes.

However, the technique is not without its limitations. It can be subject to subjective interpretation, as different assessors might score the same target differently based on their assumptions and perspectives. Despite its simplicity, CARVER is not a comprehensive risk assessment tool; it provides an overview rather than an in-depth analysis of potential threats.

Implementing the CARVER Technique

In practice, the CARVER technique involves several steps:

  1. Defining the objective: Establishing the goal and desired outcome of the operation or assessment.
  2. Identifying potential targets: Considering relevant targets and gathering information about them.
  3. Evaluating and scoring targets: Applying the CARVER criteria to each potential target.
  4. Ranking the targets: Based on the total scores, prioritizing the targets.
  5. Selecting and planning actions: Choosing the most suitable targets and planning actions accordingly.
  6. Reviewing the results: Analyzing the outcomes and using the feedback for future assessments.

Conclusion

The CARVER technique is a testament to the need for simple yet effective tools in complex operational environments. Its evolution from a military tool to a versatile methodology used across different sectors underscores its effectiveness. While it’s not without flaws, its ability to provide a structured approach to vulnerability assessment and target prioritization makes it a valuable asset in strategic planning.

--

--

Christian Baghai
Christian Baghai

No responses yet