Putin’s Desperate Showmanship: The Farce of a Fearful Leader

Christian Baghai
3 min readMay 22, 2024

--

On February 22, 2024, Vladimir Putin’s flight in a Tu-160M bomber was less a display of strength and more a desperate bid to maintain control amidst his faltering leadership. This staged event, meticulously choreographed by the Kremlin, saw Putin clad in a pilot’s uniform, complete with a “Commander-in-Chief” insignia, to bolster his image as a powerful leader. However, the reality behind this façade reveals a regime grappling with insecurity and declining influence.

The 56-second video, designed to project Putin as a decisive leader ready to use nuclear force, was a thinly veiled attempt to intimidate the West and distract from domestic failures. By manipulating the aircraft’s controls, Putin sought to convey a false sense of confidence and control. Yet, this act of bravado highlights the Kremlin’s reliance on propaganda to mask the instability and desperation underlying Putin’s leadership.

This display is a classic example of Putin’s propaganda machine at work. For domestic audiences, it reinforces the myth of Putin as a strongman ahead of the at the time upcoming presidential elections. The carefully staged scene aims to shore up his dwindling support by playing on nationalist sentiments and the fear of external threats. However, this reliance on spectacle underscores the regime’s recognition of its precarious position and the growing discontent among Russians.

Internationally, the flight was intended as a stark reminder of Russia’s nuclear capabilities. Putin’s repeated threats of nuclear escalation aim to deter Western support for Ukraine, leveraging the fear of an unpredictable leader with access to devastating weapons. However, this tactic also reveals the Kremlin’s desperation. Despite its attempts to project strength, Russia’s strategic position is increasingly tenuous, with strained resources and mounting casualties in Ukraine.

The broader implications of such displays are troubling. They contribute to an atmosphere of heightened tension and mistrust, undermining diplomatic efforts for de-escalation and disarmament. Putin’s actions have further strained relations with the West, particularly the United States, leading to a suspension of key nuclear disarmament treaties and a renewed arms race.

Other nuclear-armed states, such as the United States, China, and North Korea, engage in similar displays to assert their strategic positions. However, Putin’s propaganda lacks the subtlety and restraint seen in other nations’ deterrence strategies. Instead, his actions are driven by a need to compensate for domestic failures and maintain an illusion of control.

In reality, Putin’s stunt was a desperate attempt to distract from Russia’s internal problems and the catastrophic consequences of his policies. The regime’s reliance on such propaganda reveals a leadership out of touch with reality and increasingly reliant on fear and intimidation to maintain its grip on power. As the conflict in Ukraine continues, Putin’s actions serve as a grim reminder of the dangers posed by an insecure and desperate autocrat willing to gamble with global stability to cling to power.

--

--