How Putin and Other Authoritarians Use Orwellian Doublespeak to Manipulate Language and Reality

Christian Baghai
3 min readOct 28, 2023

--

Language is, without a doubt, humanity’s most powerful tool. It can rally nations, soothe souls, and share knowledge across generations. Yet, language can also be used to deceive, mislead, and manipulate. George Orwell was well aware of this dichotomy. In his prophetic works “1984” and “Animal Farm,” he warned us of a world where language becomes unmoored from truth, serving only the interests of those in power. The term “Orwellian doublespeak” is drawn from Orwell’s haunting visions and is sadly apt today, especially when examining the political landscape in Russia under President Vladimir Putin.

Weaponizing Language

It’s deeply troubling how the Putin regime uses language as a means of warping reality. Putin has become proficient in labeling hostile actions as “peacekeeping duties” and projecting blame on others while the truth stares us all in the face. When politicians abuse language to this extent, they’re doing more than just playing with words; they’re undermining the very fabric of public trust and international diplomacy.

Kira Rudik, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, succinctly decoded Putin’s doublespeak in a recent CNN interview. Rudik’s interpretation is haunting because it exposes a dark truth: the more opaque the language, the easier it is to disguise sinister intentions. In this manner, Putin keeps both his citizens and the international community in a state of suspended disbelief, allowing him time to make his next move.

The Universal Threat

What we must understand is that Orwellian doublespeak is not limited to any one leader or nation. While it may be manifesting most egregiously in Russian politics today, it’s also a global menace. The abuse of language to serve authoritarian ends undermines international dialogue and makes cooperation nearly impossible. How can nations come to agreements when they can’t even agree on the fundamental meaning of words?

Furthermore, when leaders distort language, they erode the confidence their citizens have in information and institutions. In a world of ‘alternative facts,’ cynicism grows, and the public space required for the functioning of a healthy democracy shrinks. This is as true in the United States, where phrases like “fake news” have become weaponized, as it is in Russia.

Lessons from History

Orwell himself fought against the totalitarian regimes of his time and witnessed how fascist and communist leaders manipulated language to serve their goals. He wrote his iconic novels as cautionary tales, urging us to be vigilant against the rise of authoritarianism and to safeguard our democratic institutions. As history has shown, the first casualty in the descent into authoritarianism is often the truth.

The Urgent Need for Clarity

We are, in many ways, living Orwell’s cautionary tales. The very fact that terms like “Orwellian” have entered common parlance indicates the urgency with which we must act. In the end, the abuse of language is not just a challenge for the linguists or the policy wonks; it’s a challenge for all of us. Because when language fails, what do we have left?

Let us be clear: language is too precious a commodity to be tarnished by those who seek to use it as a tool for manipulation and control. The fight against Orwellian doublespeak is a fight for the soul of our languages, our freedoms, and our futures. It’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.

--

--

Christian Baghai
Christian Baghai

No responses yet